In several of the scenes of the series interview with the vampireof AMC, Louis (Jacob Anderson) confesses that he is “a good liar”. He does it in front of Daniel Molloy (Eric Bogosian), to whom he declares that the first conversation they shared “was a feverish dream told to an idiot.”
Years before that encounter, he yells it into Lestat’s (Sam Reid) face. “I’ve had to lie to survive,” he explains. Finally, he confronts his exquisite vampire daughter, Claudia (Bailey Bass), to whom he confesses that he “very rarely has been able to be honest.”
good part of the series interview with the vampire it is based on a disturbing and dark duplicity, which in some points works. Nevertheless, most of the time it falls into an inconsistent terrain between a dark comedy and a perverse story.
Anne Rice’s book, and its first film version, bet on darkness and dense drama. But the amc series choose different places. One of them, to show that all the known narration was always false. “A delusion,” Louis mocks condescendingly. “But now I want to tell the truth.”
interview with the vampire
Does Interview with the Vampire fail as a production? The series has dazzling points and some even intriguing. However, as a tribute to the story that preceded it, it is just a copy without too many incentives of a more complex narrative. With an extravagant and unnecessary sense of humor, a superfluous recreation of immortality and characters without much depth, the script tends to chaos. Worse yet, to the loss of the sense of twisted conflict that he defined Rice’s work. Perhaps his biggest problem.
New secrets to discover in the series interview with the vampire
What is the truth? In reality, the story turned gothic icon is a pale shadow of what really happened. Louis was never a suffering creature crushed by morality, love and horror.
Instead, he was the owner of clubs and brothels, who found in New Orleans the place to be what he wanted. “At the cost, even, of my soul,” says this malicious new Louis, tortured but not exactly unhappy. In fact, one of the most disconcerting points of the script is turning the character into a perennial duality.
The series roughly follows the same story as the 1970s novel of the same name.. A vampire decides to tell the story of him throughout the centuries to a journalist. Only, this time, he does it from Dubai, he jumps forward almost a century in time and gives Louis — again narrator and protagonist — a New Orleans full of brilliance and decadence.
As if that wasn’t enough, interview with the vampire it also explores the character’s mind from an entirely new place. Which builds to a flimsy existential dilemma about good, evil, and why an immortal cares about such nuances of human life.
A vampire who has just discovered the taste of blood
Halfway between the desperate appetites he tries to curb, Louis also has a notorious desire to savor each one. How to balance such a dilemma? The series links him to the meaning of his existence — “I need the fullness of longing”, he says — and maintains a curious discourse on the unspeakable.
What hides in the darkness of the human heart, always close to awakening in all its strange power? interview with the vampire The question is raised multiple times. But the answer collapses in a simple look at the possibility of the monster that lives in the common man. In fact, Louis is no longer a guilt-stricken vampire. In the version for the new millennium, the character is willing to fall into temptation and enjoy it.
It may seem like a minor detail in all the considerable changes that the original story undergoes, but it is important enough to change its essence. This newborn vampire, who also admits his sexuality openly, is not looking for redemption or afraid of his appetite for blood.
In fact, all the insinuation of the homoerotic load of the book disappears completely. Louis knows that an unspeakable and irrepressible desire beats inside him. Beyond the casino he runs, the women he can enjoy and the family he must belong to, there is momentum.
in the series interview with the vampire, Louis wants freedom. He will find her in a strange, seductive and dangerous figure, who, by his own admission, “hunted him from the shadows.” But for the vampire, it wasn’t just about being attacked and made immortal on the whim of an inexplicable being. It was about love, a relentless search for satisfaction. Of course, I also wish. A wicked and turbulent one that Reid’s Lestat will arouse in Louis almost immediately.
The painful conflicts of the night and their desires
For the occasion, Lestat is a born seducer. But without the context of the mystery, the darkness, or the predatory nature of it, the character falls into a strange space. Her relationship with Louis is more erotic than that of two creatures isolated by a shared nature. The sexual tension of the book — and the Neil Jordan film — disappears in favor of a look at the drive of desire.
interview with the vampire equates killing with sexual need, something that the vampire couple share in a recurring and increasingly cruel way. Louis staggers, trying to resist the bloodlust, but Lestat is unattainable and fiercely attractive. At least, it is the way the narrative conceives of the bond between the two immortals, which ranges from a tumultuous relationship to a desperate emotional bond.
However, the series fails to narrate the real meaning of the secret — whatever it may be — that binds Louis and Lestat. It could be longing or the fact that, finally, the newborn vampire finds a form of comfort in his creator. “You could be a lot of things in the New Orleans of my time, except black and gay,” says Louis, which turns the plot into a struggle of little unfinished pains.
For the plot of the series interview with the vampire, murder is an act of absolute surrender, the last donation and loss of humanity. The production shows it as a fragrant fall into hell. An amazed and total look towards unknown places of temptation. Does the new formula work? It does so to the extent that it creates a new conflict that, in the end, is the strangest point in a story with no real personality.
The little daughter in the series interview with the vampire
Of course, Claudia’s arrival is the most controversial point in the narrative. Just like in the origin story, she ends up being turned on Lestat’s whim. But, unlike the previous version, she is not a girl, but an adolescent who deeply modifies the very meaning of her existence.
What is Claudia’s conflict, eternalized in the figure of a young woman? What will she have to deal with in the future, if nothing really limits or restricts her? For now, the series is built on the basic fact of unrequited love, female maturity and what that can mean for Lestat and Louis. But all the painful and violent complexity of the story from which it comes disappears in favor of an unknown confrontation with the nature of the vampire.
Failure Interview with the Vampire as production? The series has dazzling points and some even intriguing. However, as a tribute to the story that preceded it, it is just a copy without too many incentives of a more complex narrative. With an extravagant and unnecessary sense of humor, a superfluous recreation of immortality and characters without much depth, the script tends to chaos. Worse still, to the loss of its sense of twisted conflict that defined Rice’s work. Perhaps his biggest problem.